Easily one of the best games on Newgrounds! The animation is wonderfully smooth, and I liked the storyline. You should be very proud of your efforts.
I would easily shell out 600 Wii Points if this were on WiiWare. VERY well done! :)
A nice, simple platformer! I thought the controls, though unruly at some points, handled quite well, and the character design was quite good also.
I do have a couple of suggestions for improvement:
1) Add more items - In addition to bacon, you could add other foods and make them all worth a different number of points. This will add a bit more variation to your game.
2) More stages - A stage-select option would add some re-playability to your game.
Overall a pretty damn good platformer that I think may have been overlooked by Newgrounds.
Really nice job with this calculator program. One of my favourite little gadgets on Newgrounds!
This is a VERY, VERY well done game! The style, atmosphere, its all there and creates a real nice effect. The graphics were great and the sound added more to the depth. I'm in shock at how spooky you made this appear. Well done!
Not bad at all!
Pretty impressive use of action script. Considering your age, I'm pretty impressed. It was also nice to have authentic Simpsons songs in the background. I could just listen to those and enjoy this flash.
In terms of improvement, I would definately try to make your next game longer. I felt that this one was over before it began. In general, not bad at all. Keep it up!
thanks for the review :)
Extremely Well Done!
One of a select few truely GREAT stick games out there. There were a few minor collision-detection problems with the rifle, but the rest of the game played out very nicely. If you make a sequal, might I suggest "Blow Me Away" by Breaking Benjamin as one of the terrain's background music? Just a thought.
Great job man, and keep up the great work!
An A for Effort and Presentation!
Graphics -- This was very visually appealing. The menus looked very professional and the effects were way above average for a Dress-Up game. The clothes could use some improvement, however they were still of fairly good quality. 7.5/10 -> 8/10
Style -- I liked the concept. Its always nice to see over-done things brought back and re-invented. Unfortunately, however, it is another dress up game and they have been done to death. In general, I liked the style of the game. I just thing you should try to stray away from the Dress-Up idea. 6/10
Sound -- The music was good. It was enjoyable to listen to and didn't makie me want to turn of the speakers. 8/10.
Violence -- N/A
Intercativity -- This is where the game shines. Granted, every dress-up game is interactive. However, ypu gave the player the option to change the layer of each item. This shows that you really out a lot of effort into the intuitiveness of the game. That feature thoroughly impressed me and allowed this game to stand out among many others of this genre. 8/10.
Humour -- Dressing up a finger. Pretty damn funny. 7/10
Overall -- A good idea with excellent opening animations, menus & sounds. You have a lot of potential. Keep up the good work!
7.4/10 -> 7/10
Pretty Good Game!
Style/Concept:stationery version of Asteriods with the overall purpose of the game. 7/10.
Graphics: Again, far from breathtaking, but they get the job done. 6/10.
Sound: I'm not a big fan of the loud screaming music, but my personal preferences will not refkect this review. Overall, the music suited the game style, and fit its purpose well. 8/10.
Violence: For destroying the Clocks and the SS, I can't simply put 0 for this one. However, far from brutalluty. 5/10.
Interactivity: Not too many controls in this ones. However, of the few controls that were implemented, they all worked quite intuitively. Also, the collision detection of the lasers was on the mark a good 99% of the time. 8/10.
Humour: Controlling Wade and shotting the crap out of spam entries. What's funnier? 7/10.
Overall: Not a spectacular game, however not one to be simply ignored. Definately and above average game that had its moments. One suggestion would be that the difficulty really should increase at a faster pace. It took way too long for things to get at all difficult. A nice game in general and worth a look. 7/10.
Now THAT'S a review! Really helpful comment, thanks! And for the difficulty, I couldn't find a good math way to increase it well, but I'm too lazy to search.. :p
Another simple game...
but, yet again, strangely addictive! Having to speed up the ball through slicing added a bit of a challenge to the game, changung it from just another version/variation of Pong.
Unfortunately, because of the slowing ball, I couldn't get higher than 16 which is a little disappointing. Perhaps you can have the ball slow down at a less quickened pace. I like the idea of it slowing down however it did so after only 3 ricochets, which is a little to soon.
Overall, not a bad game! Looking forward to the next! 6/10
I rate aspects from ----- to +++++.
Anything '+' I really thank you for and find useful. Anything '-' might be a complaint or me just being greedy. Remember that I try and always give some constructive criticism, just like I ask you to do. I'll try and find something to criticise in the very best review.
: Another simple game...
Another summary that...
+: leads into the first sentence.
: but, yet again, strangely addictive!
++: comparative praise
: Having to speed up the ball through slicing added a bit of a challenge to the game, changung it from just another version/variation of Pong.
: Unfortunately, because of the slowing ball, I couldn't get higher than 16 which is a little disappointing.
: Perhaps you can have the ball slow down at a less quickened pace. I like the idea of it slowing down however it did so after only 3 ricochets, which is a little to soon.
++: criticism implied by suggestion
+++: more exposition.
++: (Fairly specific.)
For the record: it will slow down after 1 hit if you don't move the bat. If you slice it each time, it will never slow down and will move possibly faster than you can handle.
: Overall, not a bad game! Looking forward to the next!
?: Again - why? It's highlighted in red at the top right.
(note: I rank these 3 aspects in the following order from most to least important to me in a review.)
constructive criticism/suggestions: 6
exposition of experience: 5 (how many times did you play? Did you get time-outs or ring-outs?)
clarity of expression: 9
elaboration & being specific: 8
coverage (how much): 4 (could have mentioned graphics, absence of sound, ease of control... just quickly mentioned your opinion)
It could be a fatter calf, but as it is, it's big and strong. The meat is tasty. Thank you for the gift.
yet strangely entertaining. The difficulty level increased at a nice pace, and what little control was avilable was almost completely flawless. In terms of improvement (should you decide to remake this game, or something like this) would be to add more modes (Easy, Normal, Hard) and have more obstacles like falling objects, or other things on hard mode for a real challenge. Just some ideas.
Anyway, very well done! I look forward to otehr games you develop in the future. 7/10.
+: one of your thoughts
-: not a real summary
++: but leads nicely into your review
: yet strangely entertaining.
: The difficulty level increased at a nice pace,
++: somewhat specific praise
: and what little control was avilable was almost completely flawless.
++: somewhat specific praise
+: with a caveat
++: and wit.
: In terms of improvement (should you decide to remake this game, or something like this) would be to add more modes (Easy, Normal, Hard) and have more obstacles like falling objects, or other things on hard mode for a real challenge. Just some ideas.
++++: intelligent suggestions
: Anyway, very well done!
+: nice summary
: I look forward to otehr games you develop in the future.
I look forward to reading your reviews. All 98+
?: Why're you repeating what already appears highlighted in red?
: Sound: 1
-: the score seems unreasonably high given that the game doesn't have any sound...
: Humor: 5
I have no idea why you gave it a good mark in humour. I'd like to know but...
--: you didn't say.
constructive criticism/suggestions: 6
telling your experience: 1
clarity of expression: 8
elaboration & being specific: 5
coverage (how much): 7
A really nice and encouraging review. I felt you could have given more criticism though. Maybe you would have liked sound?
I would have enjoyed hearing how many times you played, whether you enjoyed it throughout and what scores you got.
Also, you mention difficulty modes, but do you find it too easy as it is? Or hard? Or ok?
You never went much into detail.
But these are suggestions for FURTHER improvement, because what you have written was a nice review that was enjoyable to read and was somewhat useful.
newgrounds.com — Your #1 online entertainment & artist community! All your base are belong to us.